Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(lsp): more support for vim.lsp.ListOpts.loclist #28637

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
May 7, 2024

Conversation

tom-anders
Copy link
Contributor

This PR mostly applies some suggestions mentioned in #28483 to the test of buf.lua and handlers.lua.

Also, I noticed that the loclist field of vim.lsp.ListOpts was used in some places, but it wasn't actually documented. So I fixed that and also added support for loclist in a place where it was missing up to now

@wookayin wookayin added documentation refactor changes that are not features or bugfixes labels May 4, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot requested review from clason and MariaSolOs May 4, 2024 17:38
Copy link
Member

@justinmk justinmk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, nice cleanup. Needs conflicts resolved

@tom-anders
Copy link
Contributor Author

(rebased to fix merge conflicts)

@justinmk
Copy link
Member

justinmk commented May 7, 2024

try make doc and make formatlua

@tom-anders
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ah, I was missing a () in news.txt, fixed now

@justinmk justinmk merged commit 69bd611 into neovim:master May 7, 2024
29 checks passed
@justinmk justinmk changed the title feat/docs(lsp): Document vim.lsp.ListOpts.loclist, cleanups in lsp.buf.lua and lsp.handlers.lua feat(lsp): more support for vim.lsp.ListOpts.loclist May 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation lsp refactor changes that are not features or bugfixes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants