feat: Add getRequest method int IAuthGuard interface

[ferjul17]

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

• The commit message follows our guidelines: https://github.com/nestjs/nest/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
• Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

[ ] Bugfix
[x] Feature
[ ] Code style update (formatting, local variables)
[ ] Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
[ ] Build related changes
[ ] CI related changes
[ ] Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

Currently I have to override the type returned by AuthGuard() otherwise typescript complains because super.getRequest() does not exist.

export class JwtAuthGuard extends (AuthGuard('jwt') as {
  new (...args: any[]): IAuthGuard & { getRequest(context: ExecutionContext): Request };
}) {
  public getRequest(context: ExecutionContext): Request {
    return super.getRequest(context) ?? GqlExecutionContext.create(context).getContext().req;
  }
}

What is the new behavior?

With these changes, I do not need this "hack" anymore, the type returned by AuthGuard() contains the method getRequest().

export default class JwtAuthGuard extends AuthGuard('jwt') {
  public getRequest(context: ExecutionContext): Request {
    return super.getRequest(context) ?? GqlExecutionContext.create(context).getContext().req;
  }
}

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

[ ] Yes
[x] No

Other information

[kamilmysliwiec]

Can you please revert back changes unrelated to this PR (move the type argument, generic parameter)? Otherwise, it looks good!

[ferjul17]

Hi, thanks for your feedback. I did that to be able to compile. I got an error without this change. But I'll try to do something better :)

[ferjul17]

That should be good now :)

[RodolfoSilva]

Is this really necessary? I think adding the type directly in the IAuthGuard type definition is enough.

[RodolfoSilva]

Good job @ferjul17, I was about to send a similar PR.

@kamilmysliwiec have any plans to include this in the next release?