Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tenant, Tenant Group and VRF not submitted everywhere when adding IP Addresses #15015

Closed
hpfried opened this issue Feb 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed
Assignees
Labels
severity: low Does not significantly disrupt application functionality, or a workaround is available status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application

Comments

@hpfried
Copy link

hpfried commented Feb 2, 2024

Deployment Type

Self-hosted

NetBox Version

v3.7.1

Python Version

3.10

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Navigate to a prefix

  2. Under the Group Addressing click the Link First available IP
    image
    -> Only the address is submitted

  3. Navigate to a prefix

  4. Navigate to IP Addresses tab

  5. click x IPs available
    image
    -> Only the address and Tenant are submitted

Expected Behavior

When you use the Add IP Address button after navigating to IP Addresses all Values are submitted
image
The generated link is like https://netbox/ipam/ip-addresses/add/?address=10.191.93.2/24&vrf=&tenant_group=2&tenant=4&return_url=/ipam/prefixes/196/ip-addresses/

Expected Behavior would be that in all cases the values for vrf, tenant and tenant group are submitted in the same way

Observed Behavior

Tenant, Tenant Group and VRF are not submitted when clicking the first available IP link inside a prefix
image
The generated link is like https://netbox/ipam/ip-addresses/add/?address=10.191.93.2/24

Tenant Group and VRF are not submitted when clicking x IPs availabe inside a prefix under IP Addresses
The generated link is like https://netbox/ipam/ip-addresses/add/?address=10.191.93.2/24&tenant=13
(Tenant Group will be correctly selected for the Tenant)

@hpfried hpfried added the type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application label Feb 2, 2024
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added status: needs owner This issue is tentatively accepted pending a volunteer committed to its implementation severity: low Does not significantly disrupt application functionality, or a workaround is available labels Feb 2, 2024
@jeremystretch jeremystretch self-assigned this Feb 5, 2024
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation and removed status: needs owner This issue is tentatively accepted pending a volunteer committed to its implementation labels Feb 5, 2024
@jeremystretch
Copy link
Member

The prefix's VRF (if any) will be pre-populated. Only the reference to the assigned tenant is missing from the link.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 6, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
severity: low Does not significantly disrupt application functionality, or a workaround is available status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants