Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Replace gunicorn with uWSGI as NetBox's default WSGI service #15154

Closed
jeremystretch opened this issue Feb 14, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed

Replace gunicorn with uWSGI as NetBox's default WSGI service #15154

jeremystretch opened this issue Feb 14, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@arthanson
Labels
status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: documentation A change or addition to the documentation
Milestone
v4.0

Comments

@jeremystretch
Copy link
Member

Change Type

Addition

Area

Installation/upgrade

Proposed Changes

In light of recent issues with gunicorn that don't seem likely to be resolved soon, I wanted to float the idea of replacing gunicorn with uWSGI in NetBox's reference deployment stack. This would not effect any changes to NetBox itself, but would modify the installation & upgrade documentation and replace the reference gunicorn config.

For more context around the proposed change, please see discussion #14780. (Thank you @markkuleinio and @tyler-8 for sharing your experiences!)
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added type: documentation A change or addition to the documentation status: under review Further discussion is needed to determine this issue's scope and/or implementation labels Feb 14, 2024
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation and removed status: under review Further discussion is needed to determine this issue's scope and/or implementation labels Mar 19, 2024
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added this to the v4.0 milestone Mar 19, 2024
This was referenced Mar 25, 2024
Closed
Merged
@jeremystretch jeremystretch mentioned this issue May 6, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@arthanson arthanson

Labels
status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: documentation A change or addition to the documentation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v4.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@arthanson @jeremystretch