Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add GPON OLT Interface Type #15854

Closed
brandan-schmitz opened this issue Apr 25, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Add GPON OLT Interface Type #15854

brandan-schmitz opened this issue Apr 25, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
status: under review Further discussion is needed to determine this issue's scope and/or implementation type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application

Comments

@brandan-schmitz
Copy link

NetBox version

v3.7.6

Feature type

Data model extension

Proposed functionality

I would like to see an additional interface type of GPON OLT added to Netbox.

Use case

Calix E7-2 GPON-8 cards use these type of ports as a way to collect many different fibers from various ONT's into a single port. They are different than a standard GPON port. They are also used by the GPON-8r2 cards.

https://www.opticalsolutions.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/clx-100-03006.pdf

Database changes

No response

External dependencies

No response

@brandan-schmitz brandan-schmitz added status: needs triage This issue is awaiting triage by a maintainer type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application labels Apr 25, 2024
@sleepinggenius2
Copy link
Contributor

On the E7-2, we just model our GPON-8 cards with the existing GPON interface type, and likewise the XG801 cards with the existing XGS-PON interface type. For us at least, it just allows us to distinguish the technology in use (GPON vs XGS-PON), but we haven't found a need to distinguish the OLT and ONT side as different interface types.

@jeremystretch jeremystretch removed their assignment Apr 29, 2024
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added status: under review Further discussion is needed to determine this issue's scope and/or implementation and removed status: needs triage This issue is awaiting triage by a maintainer labels Apr 29, 2024
@jeremystretch
Copy link
Member

I'll admit I'm not personally familiar with PON technologies, but @sleepinggenius2's approach seems to be the preferred approach.

@jeremystretch jeremystretch closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale May 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status: under review Further discussion is needed to determine this issue's scope and/or implementation type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants