Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extensible Attributes for IPAM objects? #193

Closed
gkra opened this issue Jul 5, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Extensible Attributes for IPAM objects? #193

gkra opened this issue Jul 5, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels
status: duplicate This issue has already been raised

Comments

@gkra
Copy link

gkra commented Jul 5, 2016

One of the things we're leveraging in InfoBlox for our provisioning automation is the ability to add extensible attributes (key/value pairs) to objects in the IPAM data.

Currently, we define supernets for what we call "major" environments (i.e., Integration, QA, Staging, Production), under which we then provision "minor" environments per product group, such that no two products share a single subnet per environment. (Product A has it's own Integration subnet, separate from Product B's Integration subnet, both of which are contained within the Integration supernet.) To allow our provisioning automation to attach a VM to the correct subnet, it queries IPAM (InfoBlox) for the appropriate "minor" subnet matching a specific set of attributes. We then select the next free IP address, assign the IP to the hostname of the VM-to-be, and proceed with provisioning.

Likewise, when creating the "minor" environment subnets, we search for the appropriate "major" subnet via similar attribute sets, and then apply the correct attribute sets to the newly created subnet.

I've looked at #129 and #132, and this could possibly be a duplicate of #129, especially if custom fields could be added via API, once that's available. I don't think #132 would be sufficient on its own for our needs.

@jeremystretch jeremystretch added the status: duplicate This issue has already been raised label Jul 5, 2016
@jeremystretch
Copy link
Member

Marking this as a duplicate of #129.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 23, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
status: duplicate This issue has already been raised
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants