SSL vs. TLS consistency and clarification in documentation #6414
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
With TLS landing in the stable v1.16.0 release I wanted to make sure that we're being clear and as consistent as possible about the fact that we're using TLS 1.2 as the encryption protocol, not any of the obsolete SSL protocols.
The fact that "SSL" is colloquially used to refer to any encrypted web connection—it's kind of like "Kleenex" being used for any brand of tissue—complicates this a bit. In certain places I try to ease the transition with
TLS/SSL
, but in my opinion we should be consistent in usingTLS
whenever possible, as that is technically correct.Component Name
docs
Additional Information
I've also included some grammatical/stylistic fixes to the areas relevant to TLS.
In an ideal world, any references in configuration files are changed from
ssl
totls
, but that's probably a huge project without any real value for the user. For example: