Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[dev] license should be a valid SPDX license expression #45

Closed
nemesifier opened this issue Jul 13, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

[dev] license should be a valid SPDX license expression #45

nemesifier opened this issue Jul 13, 2017 · 1 comment
Labels
bug
Projects
[GSOC-19] netjsongraph
Milestone
[GSoC 17] Second ...

Comments

@nemesifier
Copy link
Member

@geekplux while installing I'm getting:

npm WARN netjsongraph.js@0.1.2 license should be a valid SPDX license expression

this should be easy to fix.
@nemesifier nemesifier added the bug label Jul 13, 2017
@geekplux
Copy link
Contributor

OK, I'll fix it

@nemesifier nemesifier mentioned this issue Jul 13, 2017
Closed
geekplux pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 18, 2017
[bug] make license valid; fix #45
775eadc
@geekplux geekplux mentioned this issue Aug 20, 2017
Closed
@nemesifier nemesifier added this to Community bonding in [GSOC-19] netjsongraph May 8, 2019
@KuTuGu KuTuGu moved this from Community bonding to Done in [GSOC-19] netjsongraph May 10, 2019
KuTuGu added a commit to KuTuGu/netjsongraph.js that referenced this issue May 14, 2019
@KuTuGu
fix: fixed openwisp#45, fixed openwisp#57, fixed openwisp#52 && add n…
d6da7c8 
…etjsonWorker test
@KuTuGu KuTuGu mentioned this issue May 16, 2019
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug
Projects
No open projects
[GSOC-19] netjsongraph
  
Done
Milestone
[GSoC 17] Second evaluation
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

[refactor] add an experimental version rewritten in Three.js openwisp/netjsongraph.js
2 participants
@nemesifier @geekplux