New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix 1726 #1727
Fix 1726 #1727
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1727 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 82.66% 82.67%
=======================================
Files 298 298
Lines 18198 18200 +2
Branches 3473 3475 +2
=======================================
+ Hits 15044 15046 +2
Misses 2476 2476
Partials 678 678 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm ok with this change. However are you sure that's the best approach instead of just jitting the method?
The only reason it is not jitted was to allow random rules to be implemented in numpy, but we are increasingly abandoning numpy and host callbacks are stable nowadays so in the future we could just jit as well.
ok, good thanks |
This reverts parts of commit 5c9e15d.
workaround for #1726