feat: custom rate limit rules payload #6503
Conversation
paulo
added
the
type: feature
paulo
force-pushed
the
pa/send-traffic-rules-payload-api
branch
2 times, most recently
from
29f5861
to
84933cc
Compare
paulo
force-pushed
the
pa/send-traffic-rules-payload-api
branch
from
84933cc
to
0ceb7f8
Compare
src/utils/deploy/hash-fns.ts
Outdated
| // @ts-expect-error TS(7031) FIXME: Binding element 'buildData' implicitly has an 'any... Remove this comment to see the full error message | ||
| ({ buildData, displayName, generator, invocationMode, path: functionPath, priority, runtime, runtimeVersion }) => ({ | ||
| ({ | ||
| // @ts-expect-error TS(7031) FIXME: Binding element 'buildData' implicitly has an 'any... Remove this comment to see the full error message |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If someone knows a way to apply this to the whole block, please do share 😅
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the fix is to write some proper types for this :D Let me see what I can do.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
woah, thank you so much!
src/utils/deploy/hash-fns.ts
Outdated
| @@ -195,4 +219,25 @@ const hashFns = async ( | |||
| return { functionSchedules, functions, functionsWithNativeModules, fnShaMap, fnConfig } | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| const trafficRulesConfig = (trafficRules: $TSFixMe) => { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would be nice to import the type that we'll expose to users and use it here, but we can do that as a follow-up.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
in 8f4a538, i've imported the TrafficRules type from the ZISI internals. Is that what you had in mind? Also, do we consider importing those internals criminal?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, exactly! I don't think it's criminal, but I think it would be good to properly export them so we're not relying on internal file paths.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
agreed. i'll make the zisi PR and replace the import in a followup.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
here's said PR: netlify/zip-it-and-ship-it#1724
| export const config = { path: "/internal-v2-func" } | ||
| export const config = { | ||
| path: "/internal-v2-func", | ||
| rateLimit: { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't see any assertions added. I'm assuming you used this for testing things locally? Fine by me, i'm wondering if there's a good way of asserting that the ratelimit config was actually applied 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes I tested it out locally
Summary
Related to ADN-294, sends the same payload to the API we're sending now on normal builds.