Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NETOBSERV-1235 NETOBSERV-1241 UI Polishing #374

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 29, 2023

Conversation

jpinsonneau
Copy link
Contributor

@jpinsonneau jpinsonneau commented Aug 24, 2023

  • updated duplicates tooltip
    image

  • back and forth static tooltip + show only when Src or Dst filter available (as same as swap)
    image

  • align filter actions on right (avoid them moving when filter change, usefull using swap)
    image

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 24, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #374 (1da9cf8) into main (d0d7fc5) will decrease coverage by 0.53%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #374      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   57.67%   57.15%   -0.53%     
==========================================
  Files         166      167       +1     
  Lines        7712     7783      +71     
  Branches      935      935              
==========================================
  Hits         4448     4448              
- Misses       2993     3064      +71     
  Partials      271      271              
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 57.99% <100.00%> (ø)
unittests 54.83% <ø> (-1.95%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Changed Coverage Δ
...rc/components/dropdowns/query-options-dropdown.tsx 82.35% <ø> (ø)
web/src/components/overflow/links-overflow.tsx 88.88% <ø> (ø)
web/src/components/filters/filters-chips.tsx 50.00% <100.00%> (ø)
web/src/components/filters/filters-helper.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@jotak
Copy link
Member

jotak commented Aug 24, 2023

/lgtm

@memodi
Copy link
Contributor

memodi commented Aug 24, 2023

/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved QE has approved this pull request label Aug 24, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Aug 25, 2023
@jpinsonneau jpinsonneau changed the title NETOBSERV-1235 UI Polishing NETOBSERV-1235 NETOBSERV-1241 UI Polishing Aug 25, 2023
@memodi
Copy link
Contributor

memodi commented Aug 25, 2023

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the ok-to-test To set manually when a PR is safe to test. Triggers image build on PR. label Aug 25, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

New image:
quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-console-plugin:e90f2bc

It will expire after two weeks.

To deploy this build, run from the operator repo, assuming the operator is running:

USER=netobserv VERSION=e90f2bc make set-plugin-image

Copy link
Contributor

@skrthomas skrthomas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for clarifying the wording. Looks good and is much clearer. Just a few small suggestions to omit future tense and add a "the" before "Direction filter".

"Exclude return traffic": "Exclude return traffic",
"Include return traffic, with swapped source and destination filters": "Include return traffic, with swapped source and destination filters",
"Switch between one way / back and forth filtering": "Switch between one way / back and forth filtering",
"One way will only show Source or Destination traffic according to your filters": "One way will only show Source or Destination traffic according to your filters",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"One way will only show Source or Destination traffic according to your filters": "One way will only show Source or Destination traffic according to your filters",
"One way only shows Source or Destination traffic according to your filters": "One way only shows Source or Destination traffic according to your filters",

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can still get rid of "will show" 😄

web/locales/en/plugin__netobserv-plugin.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
web/src/components/filters/filters-chips.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
web/src/components/filters/filters-chips.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
web/locales/en/plugin__netobserv-plugin.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Sara Thomas <sarthoma@redhat.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the ok-to-test To set manually when a PR is safe to test. Triggers image build on PR. label Aug 29, 2023
Copy link
Member

@jotak jotak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Aug 29, 2023
@jpinsonneau
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 29, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jpinsonneau

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 4a19874 into netobserv:main Aug 29, 2023
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm qe-approved QE has approved this pull request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants