NETOBSERV-1242 Console plugin build infos

[jpinsonneau]

• get build version and build date from backend
• display these
  • in query summary
  • in console as debug

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 72.72% and project coverage change: -0.52% ⚠️

Comparison is base (d0d7fc5) 57.67% compared to head (8501428) 57.15%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #376      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   57.67%   57.15%   -0.52%     
==========================================
  Files         166      167       +1     
  Lines        7712     7789      +77     
  Branches      935      935              
==========================================
+ Hits         4448     4452       +4     
- Misses       2993     3066      +73     
  Partials      271      271              

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	58.00% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
unittests	54.82% <66.66%> (-1.96%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
cmd/plugin-backend.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pkg/server/server.go	70.00% <ø> (ø)
web/src/model/config.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
pkg/handler/frontend-config.go	39.39% <83.33%> (+3.91%)	⬆️
pkg/server/routes.go	89.65% <100.00%> (ø)
web/src/components/query-summary/summary-panel.tsx	46.51% <100.00%> (+0.84%)	⬆️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[jotak]

Would it be ok as well to just write that with console.log ? Just asking because it doesn't seem the best place to put that in the "Query Summary" panel, but on the other hand, it probably doesn't worth it either to create a new "About"-like panel just for that, so I was wondering if console.log would be good enough. Anyway, up to you, I'm also fine if you prefer to keep that as is.

(edit: actually just seeing you also write it via console.debug)

[jpinsonneau]

Would it be ok as well to just write that with console.log ? Just asking because it doesn't seem the best place to put that in the "Query Summary" panel, but on the other hand, it probably doesn't worth it either to create a new "About"-like panel just for that, so I was wondering if console.log would be good enough. Anyway, up to you, I'm also fine if you prefer to keep that as is.

I can add an extra section like Version under Configuration or we can rename it to something general like Misc.
WDYT ?

[memodi]

how would the Version show for downstream builds? would it show the iteration for.e.g: 1.4.0-27 ? I am fine having it a way that you have under Configuration. Thanks!

[jpinsonneau]

how would the Version show for downstream builds? would it show the iteration for.e.g: 1.4.0-27 ? I am fine having it a way that you have under Configuration. Thanks!

Yes ! That's my expectation. It reuses the tags from the makefile; these are already displayed in pod logs

[jotak]

I can add an extra section like Version under Configuration or we can rename it to something general like Misc.

Yes +1 for an extra section like "Version"

[openshift-ci]

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

[jpinsonneau]

I can add an extra section like Version under Configuration or we can rename it to something general like Misc.

Yes +1 for an extra section like "Version"

Done:

https://github.com/netobserv/network-observability-console-plugin/compare/011be3e64f641727dc9b8a3ca928b9fdd2be8482..8501428163754edf63a63cf2d4b5da3ad314d53c

[memodi]

LGTM, I can verify this post-merge on downstream builds.

[memodi]

/label qe-approved

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[jpinsonneau]

Thanks guys !