Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NETOBSERV-963, revert most of cert watching [1.2 backport] #315

Merged

Conversation

jotak
Copy link
Member

@jotak jotak commented Mar 30, 2023

Original PR: #312

Reverting most of certificate watching (NETOBSERV-684) as it generates a lot of pods restart.

We did not necessarily have to do this certificate watching as CM/secrets are updated within volumes.

We might however monitor carefully if new (or old) problems arise, potentially due to the kubelet sync delay for updating volumes

And also make sure certificates aren't cached in our different workloads

Reverting most of certificate watching (NETOBSERV-684) as it generates a
lot of pods restart.

We did not necessarily have to do this certificate watching as
CM/secrets are updated within volumes.

We might however monitor carefully if new (or old) problems arise,
potentially due to the kubelet sync delay for updating volumes

And also make sure certificates aren't cached in our different workloads
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 30, 2023

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (release-1.2@ac32da4). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##             release-1.2     #315   +/-   ##
==============================================
  Coverage               ?   50.39%           
==============================================
  Files                  ?       43           
  Lines                  ?     5072           
  Branches               ?        0           
==============================================
  Hits                   ?     2556           
  Misses                 ?     2311           
  Partials               ?      205           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 50.39% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@OlivierCazade OlivierCazade left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jotak
Copy link
Member Author

jotak commented Apr 3, 2023

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 3, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jotak

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved label Apr 3, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit bce2e23 into netobserv:release-1.2 Apr 3, 2023
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants