Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NETOBSERV-1471 eBPF env renaming #600

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 25, 2024

Conversation

jpinsonneau
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Following netobserv/netobserv-ebpf-agent#291, eBPF env variables were renamed (keeping compatibility with previous ones as deprecated).
This PR update these.

Dependencies

n/a

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

  • Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
  • Does this PR require product documentation?
    • If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
  • Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
    • If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
  • Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
    • If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
  • QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
    • Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
    • Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
    • No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 67.35%. Comparing base (0f519c0) to head (333ce47).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #600   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   67.35%   67.35%           
=======================================
  Files          65       65           
  Lines        7995     7995           
=======================================
  Hits         5385     5385           
  Misses       2279     2279           
  Partials      331      331           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 67.35% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@msherif1234
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 25, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: msherif1234

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@jotak
Copy link
Member

jotak commented Mar 25, 2024

I would like to change these variable names as discussed here netobserv/netobserv-ebpf-agent#291 (comment) , I'm doing that on the agent, so will have to change it again on the operator side too

@jotak
Copy link
Member

jotak commented Mar 25, 2024

/hold

@jotak
Copy link
Member

jotak commented Mar 25, 2024

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit c08b28b into netobserv:main Mar 25, 2024
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants