Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NETOBSERV-1626: add configmaps to service account #633

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 30, 2024

Conversation

msherif1234
Copy link
Contributor

Description

time=2024-04-30T15:31:14Z level=error msg=Cannot get dynamic config: configmaps "flowlogs-pipeline-transformer-config-dynamic" is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:netobserv:flowlogs-pipeline-transformer" cannot get resource "configmaps" in API group "" in the namespace "netobserv"

Dependencies

n/a

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

  • Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
  • Does this PR require product documentation?
    • If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
  • Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
    • If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
  • Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
    • If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
  • QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
    • Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
    • Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
    • No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

Signed-off-by: Mohamed Mahmoud <mmahmoud@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 30, 2024

@msherif1234: This pull request references NETOBSERV-1626 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Description

time=2024-04-30T15:31:14Z level=error msg=Cannot get dynamic config: configmaps "flowlogs-pipeline-transformer-config-dynamic" is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:netobserv:flowlogs-pipeline-transformer" cannot get resource "configmaps" in API group "" in the namespace "netobserv"

Dependencies

n/a

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

  • Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
  • Does this PR require product documentation?
  • If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
  • Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
  • If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
  • Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
  • If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
  • QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
  • Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
  • Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
  • No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@msherif1234
Copy link
Contributor Author

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the ok-to-test To set manually when a PR is safe to test. Triggers image build on PR. label Apr 30, 2024
Copy link

New images:

  • quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator:29b0cd3
  • quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator-bundle:v0.0.0-29b0cd3
  • quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator-catalog:v0.0.0-29b0cd3

They will expire after two weeks.

To deploy this build:

# Direct deployment, from operator repo
IMAGE=quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator:29b0cd3 make deploy

# Or using operator-sdk
operator-sdk run bundle quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator-bundle:v0.0.0-29b0cd3

Or as a Catalog Source:

apiVersion: operators.coreos.com/v1alpha1
kind: CatalogSource
metadata:
  name: netobserv-dev
  namespace: openshift-marketplace
spec:
  sourceType: grpc
  image: quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator-catalog:v0.0.0-29b0cd3
  displayName: NetObserv development catalog
  publisher: Me
  updateStrategy:
    registryPoll:
      interval: 1m

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the ok-to-test To set manually when a PR is safe to test. Triggers image build on PR. label Apr 30, 2024
@msherif1234
Copy link
Contributor Author

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the ok-to-test To set manually when a PR is safe to test. Triggers image build on PR. label Apr 30, 2024
Copy link

New images:

  • quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator:c5d7859
  • quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator-bundle:v0.0.0-c5d7859
  • quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator-catalog:v0.0.0-c5d7859

They will expire after two weeks.

To deploy this build:

# Direct deployment, from operator repo
IMAGE=quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator:c5d7859 make deploy

# Or using operator-sdk
operator-sdk run bundle quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator-bundle:v0.0.0-c5d7859

Or as a Catalog Source:

apiVersion: operators.coreos.com/v1alpha1
kind: CatalogSource
metadata:
  name: netobserv-dev
  namespace: openshift-marketplace
spec:
  sourceType: grpc
  image: quay.io/netobserv/network-observability-operator-catalog:v0.0.0-c5d7859
  displayName: NetObserv development catalog
  publisher: Me
  updateStrategy:
    registryPoll:
      interval: 1m

@Amoghrd
Copy link
Contributor

Amoghrd commented Apr 30, 2024

/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved QE has approved this pull request label Apr 30, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 30, 2024

@msherif1234: This pull request references NETOBSERV-1626 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the bug to target the "4.16.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Description

time=2024-04-30T15:31:14Z level=error msg=Cannot get dynamic config: configmaps "flowlogs-pipeline-transformer-config-dynamic" is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:netobserv:flowlogs-pipeline-transformer" cannot get resource "configmaps" in API group "" in the namespace "netobserv"

Dependencies

n/a

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

  • Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
  • Does this PR require product documentation?
  • If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
  • Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
  • If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
  • Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
  • If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
  • QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
  • Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
  • Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
  • No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@Amoghrd
Copy link
Contributor

Amoghrd commented Apr 30, 2024

/lgtm

@msherif1234
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approve

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 30, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: msherif1234

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit a057c25 into netobserv:main Apr 30, 2024
15 of 17 checks passed
@msherif1234 msherif1234 deleted the flp_crash branch April 30, 2024 18:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved jira/valid-reference lgtm ok-to-test To set manually when a PR is safe to test. Triggers image build on PR. qe-approved QE has approved this pull request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants