Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixes #378 upgrade jsonpath to 2.4.0 and exclude json-smart #379

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 9, 2019

Conversation

stevehu
Copy link
Contributor

@stevehu stevehu commented Feb 7, 2019

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@ddobrin ddobrin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd like to make a suggestion:

  • for handler.yml and service.yml, light-codegen can insert a number of handlers, which it comments out as a default
  • should we add a chapter in light-doc, related to codegen (https://doc.networknt.com/tool/light-codegen/openapi-generator/) which would explain the list of handlers which are generated and the circumstances under which we wish to enable/disable them?

@stevehu
Copy link
Contributor Author

stevehu commented Feb 7, 2019

@ddobrin I think it is a good idea to document all the handlers and in which case these handlers will be used. I am just not sure if this should be defined in each individual frameworks or in the light-codegen section in the document site. Or the other options is to write the comments in the handler.yml file in details.

Copy link
Contributor

@BalloonWen BalloonWen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it looks good to me
related doc to config JsonProvider as reference: https://github.com/json-path/JsonPath#jsonprovider-spi

@stevehu stevehu merged commit bcb59a0 into develop Feb 9, 2019
@stevehu stevehu deleted the issue378 branch February 9, 2019 01:27
younggwon1 pushed a commit to younggwon1/light-4j that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants