Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixs_1009_fortinet_get_system_ha_status.textfsm #1041

Conversation

diepes
Copy link
Contributor

@diepes diepes commented Dec 14, 2021

ISSUE TYPE
COMPONENT

fortinet_get_system_ha_status.textfsm

Tried to make the matching slightly more modular, by matching sections by section.
This did catch some issues where there were matches in unexpected places.

SUMMARY

New Fortinet 6.4 model

Add new raw, and update textfsm
tests/fortinet/get_system_ha_status/fortinet_get_system_ha_status_6.4.raw
tests/fortinet/get_system_ha_status/fortinet_get_system_ha_status_6.4.yml


@diepes
Copy link
Contributor Author

diepes commented Feb 8, 2022

Hi @jmcgill298 what can we do to move this along ?

@jmcgill298 jmcgill298 merged commit 735e645 into networktocode:master Dec 19, 2022
guillaume-mbali pushed a commit to unyc-io/ntc-templates that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2023
* Fixs_1009_fortinet_get_system_ha_status.textfsm

* Update tests/fortinet/get_system_ha_status/fortinet_get_system_ha_status_6.4.raw

Co-authored-by: Pieter E Smit <diepes@github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jacob McGill <9847006+jmcgill298@users.noreply.github.com>
cppmonkey pushed a commit to cppmonkey/ntc-templates that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2023
* Fixs_1009_fortinet_get_system_ha_status.textfsm

* Update tests/fortinet/get_system_ha_status/fortinet_get_system_ha_status_6.4.raw

Co-authored-by: Pieter E Smit <diepes@github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jacob McGill <9847006+jmcgill298@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants