Update SerializerBenchmark

[neuecc]

• use latest benchmarkdotnet
• use Core30
• add System.Text.Json
• add Lz4BlockArray in v2
• add use nativeresolver's v2 benchmark

result of shortrun

Method	Serializer	Mean	Error	DataSize	Gen 0	Gen 1	Gen 2	Allocated
AnswerDeserialize	BinaryFormatter_	51,762.73 ns	NA	-	8.2397	-	-	34568 B
AnswerDeserialize	Ceras_	3,295.73 ns	NA	-	0.4311	-	-	1816 B
AnswerDeserialize	DataContract_	33,098.32 ns	NA	-	3.7842	-	-	15912 B
AnswerDeserialize	FsPickler_	5,074.11 ns	NA	-	0.9384	-	-	3936 B
AnswerDeserialize	Hyperion_	5,406.63 ns	NA	-	1.0071	-	-	4216 B
AnswerDeserialize	Jil_	10,214.00 ns	NA	-	1.4343	-	-	6024 B
AnswerDeserialize	JsonNet	31,869.25 ns	NA	-	2.4414	-	-	10360 B
AnswerDeserialize	MessagePack_v1	2,477.16 ns	NA	-	0.4311	-	-	1816 B
AnswerDeserialize	MessagePack_v2	3,913.10 ns	NA	-	0.4311	-	-	1816 B
AnswerDeserialize	MessagePack_v2_opt	3,274.65 ns	NA	-	0.4311	-	-	1816 B
AnswerDeserialize	MessagePackLz4_v1	2,578.78 ns	NA	-	0.4311	-	-	1816 B
AnswerDeserialize	MessagePackLz4_v2	3,914.56 ns	NA	-	0.4272	-	-	1816 B
AnswerDeserialize	MsgPackCli	8,029.95 ns	NA	-	0.6866	-	-	2920 B
AnswerDeserialize	ProtobufNet	5,555.61 ns	NA	-	0.9689	-	-	4064 B
AnswerDeserialize	SpanJson_	4,813.62 ns	NA	-	0.4425	-	-	1864 B
AnswerDeserialize	SystemTextJson	17,537.53 ns	NA	-	0.5188	-	-	2208 B
AnswerDeserialize	Utf8Json_	7,941.75 ns	NA	-	0.4425	-	-	1864 B
AnswerSerialize	BinaryFormatter_	63,159.58 ns	NA	3.64 KB	10.8643	0.1221	-	45644 B
AnswerSerialize	Ceras_	3,264.91 ns	NA	476.00 B	1.1215	-	-	4704 B
AnswerSerialize	DataContract_	16,238.46 ns	NA	2.74 KB	3.6621	-	-	15432 B
AnswerSerialize	FsPickler_	11,868.28 ns	NA	793.00 B	1.6479	-	-	6952 B
AnswerSerialize	Hyperion_	7,623.49 ns	NA	1015.00 B	1.1520	-	-	4824 B
AnswerSerialize	Jil_	6,097.93 ns	NA	1.78 KB	2.5558	-	-	10704 B
AnswerSerialize	JsonNet	20,401.35 ns	NA	1.76 KB	2.9907	0.0305	-	12584 B
AnswerSerialize	MessagePack_v1	2,364.70 ns	NA	469.00 B	0.1183	-	-	496 B
AnswerSerialize	MessagePack_v2	2,298.42 ns	NA	469.00 B	0.1183	-	-	496 B
AnswerSerialize	MessagePack_v2_opt	2,170.86 ns	NA	433.00 B	0.1106	-	-	464 B
AnswerSerialize	MessagePackLz4_v1	3,180.48 ns	NA	450.00 B	0.1144	-	-	480 B
AnswerSerialize	MessagePackLz4_v2	3,365.30 ns	NA	451.00 B	0.1144	-	-	480 B
AnswerSerialize	MsgPackCli	5,539.52 ns	NA	515.00 B	0.9232	-	-	3872 B
AnswerSerialize	ProtobufNet	2,718.64 ns	NA	498.00 B	0.3166	-	-	1336 B
AnswerSerialize	SpanJson_	3,554.91 ns	NA	1.82 KB	0.4501	-	-	1888 B
AnswerSerialize	SystemTextJson	12,600.88 ns	NA	1.75 KB	1.3123	-	-	5520 B
AnswerSerialize	Utf8Json_	4,894.59 ns	NA	1.82 KB	0.4501	-	-	1896 B

There seems to be a point in deserialize that can be improved (due to the complexity of SequenceReader?)
But I think it's a pretty good result!
Unfortunately, the current benchmark cannot measure Contractless (because ContractKey is specified, IntKey takes precedence).
This is the point I want to improve (since many people like Contractless)

System.Text.Json's result is very bad but it is offtopic.

[neuecc]

Measure contractless is important to check v2 performance..
I've added quick-hack to support contactless only shortrun.

Method	Serializer	Mean	Error	DataSize	Gen 0	Gen 1	Gen 2	Allocated
AnswerDeserialize	BinaryFormatter_	51.639 us	NA	-	8.2397	-	-	34568 B
AnswerDeserialize	Ceras_	3.125 us	NA	-	0.4311	-	-	1816 B
AnswerDeserialize	DataContract_	32.876 us	NA	-	3.7842	-	-	15896 B
AnswerDeserialize	FsPickler_	4.947 us	NA	-	0.9384	-	-	3936 B
AnswerDeserialize	Hyperion_	5.469 us	NA	-	1.0071	-	-	4216 B
AnswerDeserialize	Jil_	10.306 us	NA	-	1.4343	-	-	6032 B
AnswerDeserialize	JsonNet	30.977 us	NA	-	2.4414	-	-	10360 B
AnswerDeserialize	MessagePack_v1	2.396 us	NA	-	0.4311	-	-	1816 B
AnswerDeserialize	MessagePack_v2	3.171 us	NA	-	0.4311	-	-	1816 B
AnswerDeserialize	MessagePackLz4_v1	2.518 us	NA	-	0.4311	-	-	1816 B
AnswerDeserialize	MessagePackLz4_v2	3.898 us	NA	-	0.4272	-	-	1816 B
AnswerDeserialize	MsgPack_v1_str_lz4	3.637 us	NA	-	0.4311	-	-	1816 B
AnswerDeserialize	MsgPack_v1_string	3.420 us	NA	-	0.4311	-	-	1816 B
AnswerDeserialize	MsgPack_v2_opt	3.235 us	NA	-	0.4311	-	-	1816 B
AnswerDeserialize	MsgPack_v2_str_lz4	6.222 us	NA	-	0.4272	-	-	1816 B
AnswerDeserialize	MsgPack_v2_string	5.168 us	NA	-	0.4272	-	-	1816 B
AnswerDeserialize	MsgPackCli	7.505 us	NA	-	0.6943	-	-	2920 B
AnswerDeserialize	ProtobufNet	5.378 us	NA	-	0.9689	-	-	4065 B
AnswerDeserialize	SpanJson_	4.767 us	NA	-	0.4425	-	-	1864 B
AnswerDeserialize	SystemTextJson	17.075 us	NA	-	0.5188	-	-	2208 B
AnswerDeserialize	Utf8Json_	8.463 us	NA	-	0.4425	-	-	1864 B
AnswerSerialize	BinaryFormatter_	73.361 us	NA	3.64 KB	10.8643	0.1221	-	45644 B
AnswerSerialize	Ceras_	2.677 us	NA	475.00 B	1.1215	-	-	4704 B
AnswerSerialize	DataContract_	15.948 us	NA	2.75 KB	3.6774	-	-	15424 B
AnswerSerialize	FsPickler_	10.949 us	NA	793.00 B	1.6479	-	-	6952 B
AnswerSerialize	Hyperion_	6.965 us	NA	1015.00 B	1.1520	-	-	4824 B
AnswerSerialize	Jil_	7.461 us	NA	1.79 KB	2.5482	-	-	10720 B
AnswerSerialize	JsonNet	27.727 us	NA	1.76 KB	2.9907	-	-	12584 B
AnswerSerialize	MessagePack_v1	2.285 us	NA	469.00 B	0.1183	-	-	496 B
AnswerSerialize	MessagePack_v2	2.941 us	NA	469.00 B	0.1183	-	-	496 B
AnswerSerialize	MessagePackLz4_v1	3.687 us	NA	450.00 B	0.1144	-	-	480 B
AnswerSerialize	MessagePackLz4_v2	3.449 us	NA	451.00 B	0.1144	-	-	480 B
AnswerSerialize	MsgPack_v1_str_lz4	4.822 us	NA	867.00 B	0.2060	-	-	888 B
AnswerSerialize	MsgPack_v1_string	3.342 us	NA	1.23 KB	0.3052	-	-	1288 B
AnswerSerialize	MsgPack_v2_opt	1.983 us	NA	433.00 B	0.1106	-	-	464 B
AnswerSerialize	MsgPack_v2_str_lz4	5.469 us	NA	868.00 B	0.2136	-	-	904 B
AnswerSerialize	MsgPack_v2_string	4.340 us	NA	1.23 KB	0.3052	-	-	1288 B
AnswerSerialize	MsgPackCli	6.235 us	NA	519.00 B	0.9232	-	-	3864 B
AnswerSerialize	ProtobufNet	2.972 us	NA	497.00 B	0.3128	-	-	1320 B
AnswerSerialize	SpanJson_	3.803 us	NA	1.83 KB	0.4539	-	-	1904 B
AnswerSerialize	SystemTextJson	16.202 us	NA	1.76 KB	1.3123	-	-	5512 B
AnswerSerialize	Utf8Json_	4.815 us	NA	1.83 KB	0.4501	-	-	1904 B

_str, _string is contractless.
The result is okay, this performance can be shipped.
However, it is still not the best compared to the competition, so I would like to aim a little higher in the next updates.