Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to find non-responders for EDA? #45

Closed
Eichhof opened this issue Nov 17, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

How to find non-responders for EDA? #45

Eichhof opened this issue Nov 17, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@Eichhof
Copy link

Eichhof commented Nov 17, 2017

Hi there,

I have read that around 5% of the people are non-responders for EDA. How can they be identified (and removed from the experiment)? I'm thinking about looking at the number of peaks (a person who has almost no peaks after a stimulus might be a non-responder).

@DominiqueMakowski
Copy link
Member

There are, indeed, some people which autonomic responses are harder to measure. The proportion can vary (due to the quality of your aquisition device, their skin thickness, autonomic regulation or any other things you could think of).

One possibility is to keep them in the analyses. They should indeed, respond (non-respond, in that case) similarly in all conditions, adding uniformly distributed variance.

Another possibility is to chose a way to remove them. I do not know about the existence of "official" guidelines to detect them. I guess you could measure the number of peaks in a baseline period, and remove all the people which number of peaks is lower than a particular treshold. Or remove the people that had no SCR in the conditions of your experiment?

The important thing is here, for whatever solution you chose, to explicitly explain it in your report/paper.

Let us know what worked best 😉

@Eichhof Eichhof closed this as completed Nov 17, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants