Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure deposit, withdraw and place/withdraw limit order correctly val… #360

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2023

Conversation

jcompagni10
Copy link
Contributor

Ensure deposit, withdraw and place/withdraw limit order correctly validate inputs to ensure that abs(tick) + fee < MaxTickExp

This not only provides better validation for transactions that will fail later
price checks, but also ensures that tick + fee combinations that could overflow an
int64 are not allowed into the system.

…idate

inputs to ensure that abs(tick) + fee < MaxTickExp

This not only provides better validation for transactins that will fail at later
price checks, but also ensures that tick + fee combinations that could overflow an
int64 are not allowed into the system.
@pr0n00gler pr0n00gler merged commit 2c5362e into merge_duality_neutron Nov 14, 2023
7 of 8 checks passed
@pr0n00gler pr0n00gler deleted the fix_tick_fee_validation branch May 9, 2024 18:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants