Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fixing error granting permissions to the EscrowComputeExecutionTemplate contract #257

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 23, 2022
Merged

Fixing error granting permissions to the EscrowComputeExecutionTemplate contract #257

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 23, 2022

Conversation

aaitor
Copy link
Member

@aaitor aaitor commented Mar 23, 2022

Description

  • Fixing error granting permissions to the EscrowComputeExecutionTemplate contract
  • bumping to v1.3.8

Is this PR related with an open issue?

Related to Issue #

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • Follows the code style of this project.
  • Tests Cover Changes
  • Documentation

@aaitor aaitor requested review from a team as code owners March 23, 2022 08:13
eruizgar91
eruizgar91 approved these changes Mar 23, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@eruizgar91 eruizgar91 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@aaitor aaitor merged commit 6f62e82 into master Mar 23, 2022
@aaitor aaitor deleted the fix/grant_compute_template branch March 23, 2022 08:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@eruizgar91 eruizgar91 eruizgar91 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@aaitor @eruizgar91