-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 538
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Incorrect license detection #2777
Comments
Adds a false positive rule for GNU tar. Fixes aboutcode-org#2777 Signed-off-by: Kevin Ji <kyji1011@gmail.com>
@chinyeungli @KevinJi22 @DennisClark @mjherzog in connection to #2811 (comment) ... is this above
a proper public-domain statement or should this be ignored? |
gentle ping. @chinyeungli @DennisClark ? |
|
Adds a false positive rule for GNU tar. Fixes aboutcode-org#2777 Signed-off-by: Kevin Ji <kyji1011@gmail.com>
This removes the public domain license that was previously one of the expected outputs of the Debian Slim Copyright license detection test. The public domain license is not an actual license for this GNU tar file. Signed-off-by: Kevin Ji <kyji1011@gmail.com>
@DennisClark Thanks! |
Fix incorrect license detection #2777
Fixed by @KevinJi22 with #2811 @KevinJi22 did you add your name to the AUTHORS.rst file? |
@pombredanne yeah, I added my name in a prior pull request. |
Excellent! thanks again. |
Description
The above notice from https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/t/tar/tar_1.30+dfsg-6_copyright has
public-domain
detectedThe
public-domain
is detected frombased on John Gilmore's public domain version of tar,
. Not sure can the tool be smart enough to tellpublic-domain
is actually not the license for this package.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: