Add extracted_from field #2042 #2215
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Jono Yang <jyang@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: Jono Yang <jyang@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: Jono Yang <jyang@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds two new methods to the Resource class: extracted_to and extracted_from. These methods return the Resource where a given Resource was extracted to or extracted from, respectively. These methods only work on Resources that were extracted using extractcode.
Fixes #2042 and replaces #2046 : this is just a cherry picking and clean merge of it
Signed-off-by: Jono Yang jyang@nexb.com
Signed-off-by: Philippe Ombredanne pombredanne@nexb.com
Tasks
Run tests locally to check for errors.