Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Next auth signin method dosen't work with Intercepting Routes #8885

Closed
msobkyy opened this issue Oct 17, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Next auth signin method dosen't work with Intercepting Routes #8885

msobkyy opened this issue Oct 17, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working invalid reproduction The issue did not have a detectable valid reproduction URL triage Unseen or unconfirmed by a maintainer yet. Provide extra information in the meantime.

Comments

@msobkyy
Copy link

msobkyy commented Oct 17, 2023

Environment

System:
OS: Windows 10 10.0.22621
CPU: (16) x64 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H with Radeon Graphics
Memory: 11.37 GB / 31.35 GB
Binaries:
Node: 18.12.1 - C:\Program Files\nodejs\node.EXE
npm: 8.19.2 - C:\Program Files\nodejs\npm.CMD
Browsers:
Edge: Spartan (44.22621.2283.0), Chromium (118.0.2088.46)
Internet Explorer: 11.0.22621.1

Reproduction URL

private repo

Describe the issue

I have a next js 13.5 with next-auth application and I have a custom login page with an Intercepted route to open the login page in a modal instead of leaving the current page if the route opened inside the application and it works fine according to next js docs https://nextjs.org/docs/app/building-your-application/routing/intercepting-routes

and everything is working fine but the problem is when I use the sign-in method from next-auth it skips the Intercepted route and opens the page but when I use router.push() to the sign-in link it works fine any idea why this is happening?

How to reproduce

use sigin method with Intercepted route

Expected behavior

open Intercepted route instead of redirect the page

@msobkyy msobkyy added bug Something isn't working triage Unseen or unconfirmed by a maintainer yet. Provide extra information in the meantime. labels Oct 17, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the invalid reproduction The issue did not have a detectable valid reproduction URL label Oct 17, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

We could not detect a valid reproduction link. Make sure to follow the bug report template carefully.

Why was this issue closed?

To be able to investigate, we need access to a reproduction to identify what triggered the issue. We need a link to a public GitHub repository. Example: (NextAuth.js example repository).

The bug template that you filled out has a section called "Reproduction URL", which is where you should provide the link to the reproduction.

  • If you did not provide a link or the link you provided is not valid, we will close the issue.
  • If you provide a link to a private repository, we will close the issue.
  • If you provide a link to a repository but not in the correct section, we will close the issue.

What should I do?

Depending on the reason the issue was closed, you can do the following:

  • If you did not provide a link, please open a new issue with a link to a reproduction.
  • If you provided a link to a private repository, please open a new issue with a link to a public repository.
  • If you provided a link to a repository but not in the correct section, please open a new issue with a link to a reproduction in the correct section.

In general, assume that we should not go through a lengthy onboarding process at your company code only to be able to verify an issue.

My repository is private and cannot make it public

In most cases, a private repo will not be a sufficient minimal reproduction, as this codebase might contain a lot of unrelated parts that would make our investigation take longer. Please do not make it public. Instead, create a new repository using the templates above, adding the relevant code to reproduce the issue. Common things to look out for:

  • Remove any code that is not related to the issue. (pages, API Routes, components, etc.)
  • Remove any dependencies that are not related to the issue.
  • Remove any third-party service that would require us to sign up for an account to reproduce the issue.
  • Remove any environment variables that are not related to the issue.
  • Remove private packages that we do not have access to.
  • If the issue is not related to a monorepo specifically, try to reproduce the issue without a complex monorepo setup

I did not open this issue, but it is relevant to me, what can I do to help?

Anyone experiencing the same issue is welcome to provide a minimal reproduction following the above steps by opening a new issue.

I think my reproduction is good enough, why aren't you looking into it quickly?

We look into every issue and monitor open issues for new comments.

However, sometimes we might miss a few due to the popularity/high traffic of the repository. We apologize, and kindly ask you to refrain from tagging core maintainers, as that will usually not result in increased priority.

Upvoting issues to show your interest will help us prioritize and address them as quickly as possible. That said, every issue is important to us, and if an issue gets closed by accident, we encourage you to open a new one linking to the old issue and we will look into it.

Useful Resources

@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 17, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug Something isn't working invalid reproduction The issue did not have a detectable valid reproduction URL triage Unseen or unconfirmed by a maintainer yet. Provide extra information in the meantime.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant