Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve findability of the holiday calendar that is relevant for you #5193

Open
jancborchardt opened this issue May 4, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
1. to develop Accepted and waiting to be taken care of enhancement New feature request Feature: WebCal

Comments

@jancborchardt
Copy link
Member

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

In the holiday calendar modal, currently you need to scroll through the list to find your relevant country (if you don’t live somewhere starting with "A").

Describe the solution you'd like

It would be nice to have the relevant calendars sorted up top. We do have the info of locale and language, so we can:

  • Sort the first one based on locale
  • and the second one based on your language (if different)

According to @ChristophWurst this would need a manual mapping of locale/language codes to the list of Thunderbird holiday calendars. Seems like a 1-time manual task which would improve UX a lot though. :)

Describe alternatives you've considered

An alternative proposed by @nimishavijay was adding a search field. While that will catch more cases like adding other holiday calendars, I think it’s first important to focus on making the main case on adding a calendar for yourself as simple as opening the modal and clicking.

Additional context

#5167

@jancborchardt jancborchardt added 1. to develop Accepted and waiting to be taken care of enhancement New feature request labels May 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1. to develop Accepted and waiting to be taken care of enhancement New feature request Feature: WebCal
Projects
Status: 🧭 Planning evaluation / ideas
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants