New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
enforce forceAll #577
enforce forceAll #577
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Maxence Lange <maxence@artificial-owl.com>
/backport to stable21 |
/backport to stable20 |
/backport to stable19 |
I only checked the code and didn't test it. |
Not working here. Only reverting #566 fixes those issues, with the downside of #566 (comment) |
Please excuse me if I'm wrong but this PR doesn't do anything. (I neglect a possible speed advantage) |
Signed-off-by: Julius Härtl <jus@bitgrid.net>
@daita I pushed another commit in order to also pass the forceAll parameter to the method that fetches the members list, which fixes the issue on my test setup.
It is not only a speed advantage but due to the OR operation if the first one matches the others will never get evaluated, so the Anyways testing of the two patches together is highly appreciated. |
@juliushaertl Thank you for the explanation. |
Modifications do not fix for me, see #576 (I can't reopen bug). |
/backport to stable20 |
/backport to stable19 |
Should fix #576