Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Directly fix invalid values of DTEND and DTSTART #4066

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 29, 2017

Conversation

nickvergessen
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: Joas Schilling <coding@schilljs.com>
@mention-bot
Copy link

@nickvergessen, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @rullzer to be a potential reviewer.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #4066 into master will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 59.18%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #4066      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     54.24%   54.22%   -0.02%     
+ Complexity    21285    21283       -2     
============================================
  Files          1310     1309       -1     
  Lines         81187    81198      +11     
  Branches       1284     1284              
============================================
- Hits          44036    44030       -6     
- Misses        37151    37168      +17
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
apps/dav/lib/Migration/CalDAVRemoveEmptyValue.php 59.18% <59.18%> (ø) 9 <9> (?)
apps/comments/lib/EventHandler.php 79.16% <0%> (-8.34%) 7% <0%> (ø)
apps/files_external/lib/Lib/Storage/SMB.php 47.22% <0%> (+0.39%) 112% <0%> (ø) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ec6853a...3bd501a. Read the comment docs.

@MorrisJobke
Copy link
Member

@nickvergessen So this is intended to be run on every upgrade? Otherwise add a version number check.

@nickvergessen
Copy link
Member Author

Basically yes. It only does stuff for broken entries anyway

Copy link
Member

@MorrisJobke MorrisJobke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good 👍

Copy link
Member

@rullzer rullzer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. And fixed some broken stuff I threw at it.

So lets do it...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants