Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add $shallow arg to RoomShareProvider::getSharesInFolder #7648

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 26, 2022

Conversation

artonge
Copy link
Contributor

@artonge artonge commented Jul 26, 2022

A new $shallow argument was introduced to IShareProvider::getSharesInFolder in NC25 by nextcloud/server#31728.

This PR adds this new argument and the necessary changes to make it work based on this example https://github.com/nextcloud/server/pull/31728/files#diff-dee1351696d7eae959761edf66c8e5a9052e28be73319733d857a9ab2d9fc967=

Both PRs will have failing CI as long as the other one is not merged. I am unsure which PR to merge first to limit the failing CI on both sides.

A new `$shallow` argument was introduced to `IShareProvider::getSharesInFolder` in NC25 by nextcloud/server#31728.

This PR adds this new argument and the necessary changes to make it work based on this example https://github.com/nextcloud/server/pull/31728/files#diff-dee1351696d7eae959761edf66c8e5a9052e28be73319733d857a9ab2d9fc967=

Signed-off-by: Louis Chemineau <louis@chmn.me>
@artonge artonge force-pushed the feat/adapt_RoomShareProvider_to_new_interface branch from 9fe7323 to 42418f4 Compare July 26, 2022 10:03
Copy link
Member

@nickvergessen nickvergessen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🐘

@nickvergessen
Copy link
Member

Both PRs will have failing CI as long as the other one is not merged. I am unsure which PR to merge first to limit the failing CI on both sides.

Since it's an optional parameter why should it fail on this repo?

@artonge
Copy link
Contributor Author

artonge commented Jul 26, 2022

Since it's an optional parameter why should it fail on this repo?

Hmmm, I though linting would be stricter, perfect if it does not fail :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants