Add ValidationSummary and rework ARCExpect top level API #99
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Includes initial specs laid out in #95 - Add F#-friendly serialization via FSharp.System.Text.Json - Add tests
kMutagene
force-pushed
the
validation-summary
branch
from
e022116
to
2dcc34e
Compare
… summary: - add a way to get specification validation cases for supported specs - reflect changes in tests and tool
- This object contains all necessary metadata and validation cases - Add a toip level API `Setup` class to create this on a high level - combine internally with Package metadata and ValidationSummary - Re-work top level API to only use this type - Specification validation now provides this object instead of a simple test - Rework BadgeCreation to autromatically be red based on wether input summary has failed critical tests - adapt summary tests
kMutagene
changed the title
kMutagene
changed the title
This was referenced Apr 26, 2024
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
closes #94 - we now have an object that can contain both critical and non critical tests, as well as an output format and API that support that distinction
closes #95 - this PR implements the summary format
closes #96 - new ARCExpect top level API contains a fix for creating this folder
closes #98 - new ARCExpect top level API can create metadata from binding frontmatter and use it in the validation pipeline