Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

inconsistent list type replace #208

Closed
kyuwoo-choi opened this issue Jun 15, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed

inconsistent list type replace #208

kyuwoo-choi opened this issue Jun 15, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@kyuwoo-choi
Copy link
Member

Version

Test Environment

Current Behavior

The attempt to change the type from task to ul,ol is failing.
Because it doesn't remove markdown task syntax.
WYSIWYG doesn't remove task class too.

OL

  • * -> OL -> 1.
  • 1. -> OL -> 1.
  • * [ ] -> OL -> 1. [ ]
  • 1. [ ] -> OL -> 1. [ ]

UL

  • * -> UL -> *
  • 1. -> UL -> *
  • * [ ] -> UL -> * [ ]
  • 1. [ ] -> UL -> * [ ]

TASK

  • * -> TASK -> * [ ]
  • 1. -> TASK -> 1. [ ]
  • * [ ] -> TASK -> *
  • 1. [ ] -> TASK -> 1.

Expected Behavior

OL

  • * -> OL -> 1.
  • 1. -> OL -> 1.
  • * [ ] -> OL -> 1.
  • 1. [ ] -> OL -> 1.

UL

  • * -> UL -> *
  • 1. -> UL -> *
  • * [ ] -> UL -> *
  • 1. [ ] -> UL -> *

TASK

  • * -> TASK -> * [ ]
  • 1. -> TASK -> 1. [ ]
  • * [ ] -> TASK -> *
  • 1. [ ] -> TASK -> 1.
@kyuwoo-choi kyuwoo-choi added this to the 1.2.3 milestone Jun 15, 2018
seonim-ryu pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 2, 2020
* fix: wrong markdown list type change

* fix: wrong wysiwyg list type change

* refactor: apply code review (ref #209)
seonim-ryu pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 6, 2020
* fix: wrong markdown list type change

* fix: wrong wysiwyg list type change

* refactor: apply code review (ref #209)
seonim-ryu pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2020
Make the existence of the NPM package more obvious
seonim-ryu pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2020
Make the existence of the NPM package more obvious
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant