New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ENH: b0 reference and skullstrip workflow #50
Conversation
Hello @josephmje, Thank you for updating! Cheers! There are no style issues detected in this Pull Request. 🍻 To test for issues locally, Comment last updated at 2020-01-15 16:46:44 UTC |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #50 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 55.51% 52.37% -3.15%
==========================================
Files 11 16 +5
Lines 762 907 +145
Branches 110 114 +4
==========================================
+ Hits 423 475 +52
- Misses 338 431 +93
Partials 1 1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Had a quick pass so that you can get things moving along
initial port from niworkflows add initial pre-mask step fix doc add pre_mask address review comments add period extract b0s first fix function name typo initial port from niworkflows add initial pre-mask step fix doc add pre_mask address review comments add period extract b0s first fix function name typo remove MatchHeader
Co-Authored-By: Oscar Esteban <code@oscaresteban.es>
Co-Authored-By: Oscar Esteban <code@oscaresteban.es>
Co-Authored-By: Oscar Esteban <code@oscaresteban.es>
Co-Authored-By: Oscar Esteban <code@oscaresteban.es>
@oesteban thanks for hacking on this! new report! https://458-174237413-gh.circle-artifacts.com/0/tmp/THP002/derivatives/dmriprep/sub-THP0005.html |
I tried a fix to the niworkflows problem and then rolled back. I'm going to go for it. Thanks for this precious contribution! |
No description provided.