Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ENH] Store BOLD reference images #1306

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Oct 5, 2018
Merged

Conversation

oesteban
Copy link
Member

@oesteban oesteban commented Oct 4, 2018

Changes proposed in this pull request

  • Stores BOLD reference images in the output folder (following new RC1 conventions).
  • Updates DerivativesDataSink not to insert the _<bids_type>_ in the middle of every derivative name.

Documentation that should be reviewed

@oesteban oesteban changed the title [ENH] Store BOLD reference images [ENH,WIP] Store BOLD reference images Oct 4, 2018
@effigies
Copy link
Member

effigies commented Oct 4, 2018

Just want to say: I think the renaming process should be all-or-nothing. Once it starts, we should finish before releasing. Do we want to make a release before starting to merge PRs like this?

@oesteban
Copy link
Member Author

oesteban commented Oct 4, 2018

Do we want to make a release before starting to merge PRs like this?

Yesss

fmriprep/sub-01/func/sub-01_task-mixedgamblestask_run-01_space-fsaverage5.L.func.gii
fmriprep/sub-01/func/sub-01_task-mixedgamblestask_run-01_space-fsaverage5.R.func.gii
fmriprep/sub-01/func/sub-01_task-mixedgamblestask_run-01_space-MNI152NLin2009cAsym_brainmask.nii.gz
fmriprep/sub-01/func/sub-01_task-mixedgamblestask_run-01_space-MNI152NLin2009cAsym_desc-3dref_bold.nii.gz
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this qualifies as a bold.nii.gz, as it's not a 4D time series. We didn't try to get a ref suffix (or perhaps boldref, since there is no longer a bold entry) into RC1, but we can still use it as long as there isn't a more appropriate suffix in the spec.

Pinging BIDS-meister @chrisfilo for a second opinion, though.

@chrisgorgo
Copy link
Contributor

chrisgorgo commented Oct 4, 2018 via email

@oesteban oesteban changed the title [ENH,WIP] Store BOLD reference images [ENH] Store BOLD reference images Oct 4, 2018
@oesteban
Copy link
Member Author

oesteban commented Oct 4, 2018

thumbs up?

@effigies
Copy link
Member

effigies commented Oct 4, 2018

Sure. Let's move pretty quickly on the rest of the renamings, then. I listed the anat ones. I'll check for any functional ones that aren't covered by that in the morning.

@oesteban oesteban merged commit d617210 into nipreps:master Oct 5, 2018
@oesteban oesteban deleted the enh/issue-960 branch October 5, 2018 00:28
@oesteban oesteban restored the enh/issue-960 branch October 6, 2018 03:25
@oesteban oesteban deleted the enh/issue-960 branch October 6, 2018 03:26
oesteban added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2018
In #1306, ``DataSink``s were updated and the modality entity was not
writen on the name anymore.
However, I missed to update the reports configuration to contemplate the
change.

This hotfix addresses the problem.
@effigies effigies added this to the 1.2.0 milestone Oct 24, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants