Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DOC: Refinement of confounds documentation after #1877 #1906

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Dec 11, 2019

Conversation

oesteban
Copy link
Member

@oesteban oesteban commented Dec 6, 2019

This PR addresses further issues after #1877:

This PR addresses further issues:

- Address warnings 2) and 3) of #1049 - Close #1049, and I've opened #1905 to follow up conversations
- Add documentation about DCT regressors, close #1167.
- Address items 2) and 3) of #1521.
@oesteban oesteban added this to the 1.6.0 milestone Dec 6, 2019
@oesteban oesteban requested review from jdkent and kfinc December 6, 2019 19:11
@oesteban oesteban added this to In progress in Documentation via automation Dec 6, 2019
@auto-comment

This comment has been minimized.

@oesteban
Copy link
Member Author

oesteban commented Dec 6, 2019

Documentation automation moved this from In progress to Reviewer approved Dec 10, 2019
Copy link
Collaborator

@mgxd mgxd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

docs/outputs.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/outputs.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/outputs.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/outputs.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
oesteban and others added 2 commits December 10, 2019 09:38
Co-Authored-By: Chris Markiewicz <markiewicz@stanford.edu>
Copy link
Contributor

@rciric rciric left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! A few minor comments.

docs/outputs.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/outputs.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
@oesteban
Copy link
Member Author

I'd really love to have a green tick from @kfinc and/or @jdkent before merging this...

Copy link
Collaborator

@jdkent jdkent left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One comment on what to include about recalculation of counfounds when using ICA-AROMA

docs/outputs.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/outputs.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Collaborator

@jdkent jdkent left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added one more crucial citation for the debate.

docs/outputs.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/outputs.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/outputs.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-Authored-By: Chris Markiewicz <markiewicz@stanford.edu>
Co-Authored-By: James Kent <james-kent@uiowa.edu>
@oesteban oesteban merged commit ca65f35 into master Dec 11, 2019
Documentation automation moved this from Reviewer approved to Done Dec 11, 2019
@oesteban oesteban deleted the docs/issue-1049 branch December 11, 2019 23:28
@mgxd mgxd moved this from 1.6 Blocking to Complete in master in Release Roadmap Dec 12, 2019
@kfinc
Copy link
Contributor

kfinc commented Dec 13, 2019

Hi! Sorry for the delay, I was out of the office for 1 week. Confounds page looks great! Many thanks for incorporating all the changes.

@oesteban oesteban removed this from Done in Documentation Sep 29, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
No open projects
Release Roadmap
Complete in master
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add description of CosineX regressors to the documentation
6 participants