New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
T1w intensity harmonization (or intensity normalization) #489
Labels
Milestone
Comments
These guys are doing 3dUnifize after N4BiasFieldCorrection - https://github.com/jlohmeier/atlasBREX. |
I'd run it before and after. Like they laterally recommend in their docs
…On May 9, 2017 16:35, "Chris Filo Gorgolewski" ***@***.***> wrote:
These guys are doing 3dUnifize after N4BiasFieldCorrection -
https://github.com/jlohmeier/atlasBREX.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#489 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAkhxpcm8NKnINHXESj8H-AQbeUcCXvKks5r4Pg0gaJpZM4NSd0A>
.
|
3dUnifize seems to be removing the bias field (see https://youtu.be/LxApX0Ijg5w) running it before N4 might impair the matrics that were suppose to measure bias field. |
I was referring to |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I've been entertaining this idea for a while, and I think that it would make our measures a lot more homogeneous across sites.
These two refs. could give me a start:
Other refs.:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: