Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ENH: Improving the resource monitor -- infer PID from process name #1049

Merged
merged 15 commits into from Mar 28, 2023

Conversation

esavary
Copy link
Contributor

@esavary esavary commented Feb 2, 2023

  • Store the logfile at the path given as argument
  • Add the possibility to give the process name instead of the PID

mriqc/instrumentation/resources.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
mriqc/instrumentation/resources.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
mriqc/instrumentation/resources.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
mriqc/instrumentation/resources.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
mriqc/instrumentation/__main__.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
mriqc/instrumentation/resources.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
mriqc/instrumentation/resources.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@esavary
Copy link
Contributor Author

esavary commented Feb 3, 2023

The last commits include #1051.

@oesteban oesteban changed the title Modification of the resource tracker ENH: Improving the resource monitor -- infer PID from process name Feb 3, 2023
esavary and others added 7 commits February 3, 2023 15:37
- Store the logfile at the path given as argument
-Add the possibility to give the process name instead of the PID
Co-authored-by: Oscar Esteban <code@oscaresteban.es>
Co-authored-by: Oscar Esteban <code@oscaresteban.es>
Co-authored-by: Oscar Esteban <code@oscaresteban.es>
Co-authored-by: Oscar Esteban <code@oscaresteban.es>
@oesteban oesteban merged commit a9ecf62 into nipreps:master Mar 28, 2023
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants