Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Permalink feature would be nice #22

Closed
rampatra opened this issue Jun 22, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Permalink feature would be nice #22

rampatra opened this issue Jun 22, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@rampatra
Copy link

If the privacy policy can be generated by passing the values (app name, company etc.) in the query parameter then we need not host the privacy policy elsewhere. We can just use this link in Google Play Store etc.

Any thoughts?

@nisrulz
Copy link
Owner

nisrulz commented Jun 23, 2018

Thats a good idea.

However, if I put up an implementation of the same, there are 2 things that might be of an issue

  1. The design of the webpage cannot be modified, because the page is basically hosted along with the webapp but is changed based on query params in the url that hits the page
  2. The web app becomes a single point of failure. So if say the web app goes does, it goes down for people depending on that particular privacy page, which I think is a serious problem.

What do you think?

@iSWORD
Copy link
Contributor

iSWORD commented Sep 23, 2018

I think these documents are better hosted on the company's website or even better on the app's server. Personally I use the app's server to maintain the same security measures when showing the documents in the app that I use when consuming the APIs.

@nisrulz nisrulz closed this as completed Sep 24, 2018
@nisrulz nisrulz reopened this Sep 24, 2018
@nisrulz
Copy link
Owner

nisrulz commented Oct 20, 2019

I am going to close this issue, as I don't think this feature will be included in the webapp because of the same reason as @iSWORD commented above as well as my own.

If you or anyone has any questions, then I will reopen this feature in the future.

Thank you for opening the issue :)

@nisrulz nisrulz closed this as completed Oct 20, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants