New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add the ability to name a generated release #68
Comments
As always, I am one step behind and I didn't realize about the default filenames of the generated project, until you closed this issue. Well, I don't know if I explained it correctly, sometimes it is difficult to make things understandable. I forgot one thing, I tried it just in Linux, but I suppose in OSX should work (I can't check it, sorry). And for Windows (I haven't yet tried to build Nitrogen in Windows)... But when I have some time, I will have a look if I can do it. |
I actually would be interested in these changes, however, the reason I The way you're doing it here is the correct way to do it, but it would The solution might be as simple as just changing the config handler to rely On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:03 AM, fooflare notifications@github.com wrote:
Jesse Gumm |
Yeah, that seems to be a bit more difficult. I haven't enough knowledge about nitrogen right now, so I feel like a monkey pressing buttons and trying to be lucky... But it was just the first try :) |
By default, a generated release is called 'nitrogen', creates a directory called 'nitrogen', and uses a 'nitrogen.app.src' and all the other specifics. But it's more common that a user will want to create an app that uses nitrogen, not one that's necessarily named nitrogen. As such, being able to create a new project using something similar to rebar's or chicagoboss's approach with
make rel_yaws PROJECT=myapp
, which would properly name files and also ensure that one doesn't need to create a custom config handler for this.Food for thought.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: