Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename project to graphql-typewriter #27

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jan 18, 2017
Merged

Rename project to graphql-typewriter #27

merged 3 commits into from Jan 18, 2017

Conversation

nknapp
Copy link
Owner

@nknapp nknapp commented Jan 16, 2017

Before this is merged, ths git-repository must be renamed as well.

Please add a comment to #26 if you have an oppionon about the rename.

@nknapp nknapp changed the title Rename project to graphql-typewriter WIP: Rename project to graphql-typewriter Jan 16, 2017
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 16, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling d34defe on graphql-typewriter into 526468a on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 16, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling f259959 on graphql-typewriter into 526468a on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 16, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 5021007 on graphql-typewriter into 526468a on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 17, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling ea2386e on graphql-typewriter into 526468a on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 17, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 3606979 on graphql-typewriter into 526468a on master.

@nknapp nknapp changed the title WIP: Rename project to graphql-typewriter Rename project to graphql-typewriter Jan 18, 2017
@nknapp nknapp merged commit 153b923 into master Jan 18, 2017
@nknapp nknapp deleted the graphql-typewriter branch January 18, 2017 21:46
@msiegenthaler
Copy link
Collaborator

Good idea - the old name was a bit unwieldy

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants