-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Weak-perspective camera coordinates #1
Comments
If you look at how we are computing the orthographic projection:
You can see that the first coefficient in the camera is the scaling factor whereas the second and third the translation in the x and y direction. So more formally, the transformation we are doing is
I hope this helps |
Thanks for the fast reply. |
Actually I want to make my intention clear. Given this camera parameters and the predicted SMPL model, is it possible for me to project every point of the mesh to the image? How is it done? |
The orthographic projection function that I mentioned above projects the mesh in the normalized image plane. If you want to do the projection in pixel coordinates, you have to convert the projected coordinates from [-1,1] to [0,224] by a simple translation and scaling. You can also do the perspective projection from scratch as
This is t in the above projection equation. R will be the identity matrix and K will be
|
Thanks once again for the helpful response. Closing it, for now... |
Hi, |
Same question. If you have any mathematical solution, please let me know, thank you. |
Hello, great job.
I've a question about the estimated perspective camera position. I assume that the SMPL model goes as (x,y,z) and after watching the values at the estimated camera I noticed that the first coefficient was big ( x? ) , but I expected the last coordinate to be big ( z )
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: