You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- None
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1007/s10618-020-00689-6 may be a valid DOI for title: ABBA: adaptive Brownian bridge-based symbolic aggregation of time series
- 10.1109/tit.1982.1056489 may be a valid DOI for title: Least squares quantization in PCM
- 10.1145/882082.882086 may be a valid DOI for title: A symbolic representation of time series, with implications for streaming algorithms
- 10.1145/3532622 may be a valid DOI for title: An efficient aggregation method for the symbolic representation of temporal data
- 10.1016/j.is.2023.102294 may be a valid DOI for title: ECG classification with learning ensemble based on symbolic discretization
- 10.1007/978-3-031-24378-3_4 may be a valid DOI for title: Fast Time Series Classification with Random Symbolic Subsequences
- 10.1007/s10618-007-0064-z may be a valid DOI for title: Experiencing SAX: a novel symbolic representation of time series
- 10.1109/seed55351.2022.00016 may be a valid DOI for title: Foreseer: Efficiently Forecasting Malware Event Series with Long Short-Term Memory
- 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109123 may be a valid DOI for title: Data-driven prognostics based on time-frequency analysis and symbolic recurrent neural network for fuel cells under dynamic load
- 10.1145/3448672 may be a valid DOI for title: A Framework for Generating Summaries from Temporal Personal Health Data
INVALID DOIs
- None
If you can check if the proposed DOI are right for your reference, and if so include them in your .bib that would be great :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If sorted, then this can be closed. When you solve such stuff, note that you can refer to the issue number ( here #5 ) in the commit message, so that commit gets ping here.
Joss's editorialbot there openjournals/joss-reviews#6294 found missing DOI's in the paper references:
If you can check if the proposed DOI are right for your reference, and if so include them in your .bib that would be great :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: