Rename the library and the repo

[fdiblen]

We should rename the library and use the same name for the repo for clarity.
Some suggestions:

• cudacpp
• cudacxx
• cuda++
• cudawrappers
• your suggestion

[jspaaks]

cudawrap

[fdiblen]

Our final suggestion is:
repo name: cuda-wrappers-for-cpp
library name: cuda-wrappers (libcuda-wrappers.so)

What do you think @benvanwerkhoven @isazi @bouweandela ?

[bouweandela]

I think this would need to be discussed with our project partners @john-romein @csbnw and @svlugt

[john-romein]

As the idea is very much inspired by the OpenCL C++ wrapper (which is, surprisingly, named ...: the OpenCL C++ wrapper), I think the name of this wrapper should be similar: the CUDA C++ wrapper.

[john-romein]

We prefer to keep cu:: as namespace.

[john-romein]

There should be separate shared objects for the individual wrappers, to avoid that all CUDA libraries (libcuda.so, libcufft.so, libnvrtc.so etc.) need to be linked in as well, even if, for example, the user does not even use cufft).

[svlugt]

Load objects in cmake with find_package: e.g. use find_package(cudawrappers REQUIRED COMPONENTS nvrtc)

[fdiblen]

As agreed this morning, we renamed the repository and the library as cudawarppers
Created #95 and #96 for the suggestions in the comments. Closing this issue.