-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Package is not available on pypi #12
Comments
I think that such PyPI entries already exist: I believe that preserving the name is important, in order to avoid unnecessary renames in code, over many packages.
I would be happy to do both, as I have had the same issue with |
Yep, I agree with all of that. I was in contact with Ero Carrera over email about adding a maintainer, he seemed happy with it, I followed up to ask about the next steps and he didn't get back to me. Definitely worth trying again. I can reach out again if you want - or leave it to you. This was about 18 months ago IIRC. |
+1 for someone taking over the existing PyPI entry and merging these Python 3 fixes. |
Yes, it would definitely be good to try to consolidate the different pydot forks and update the package on PyPI. Pinging @ksambor and @prmtl of pydot-ng, @carlos-jenkins of pydot-plus, and @ajsteven130, whose fork has recent work. |
Hello, For my fork, I just went through and cleared all the errors to get pydot to install on Python 3.4. It installs and works fine, but I am not sure it should be counted on as an official package. I'd be very happy if the small of work there is useful and could be integrated into a better maintained repository. If there is any way I can help, let me know |
bmcorser has a PyPI entry for Python 3 called |
Our fork ( |
Just a reminder, it would be great if someone could work out which of the various forks is the best starting point, contact Ero to get the name on PyPI and upload a new release. I just helped another person on StackOverflow who was trying to use the original 'pydot' package on Python 3. |
I emailed @erocarrera (last week) about maintenance of The collection of PEP 8 is not followed, and top-down parsing ( For posterity, carlos-jenkins/pydotplus#1. |
Hey all, I think moving to a maintained version of pydot is definitely the way to go. I modified this package to assist me in my graduate studies, but I'm afraid I don't have the bandwidth to maintain it. Either pydot-ng or pydotplus seems to be the way to go. TL;DR: I don't have the bandwidth to maintain this package, please look at forks, including pydot-ng and pydotplus. |
@erocarrera has added me as a maintainer for |
Excellent, thanks @johnyf |
|
I want to publish a package on pypi that depends on
pydot
.As you're aware, the pypi package is unmaintained an out-of-date.
I briefly had my own fork and contacted the maintainer. He seemed willing to pass on ownership of the palckage, but the conversation never went beyond that.
IMO uploading the package under a different name (even
pydot2
) would be a good way forward.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: