Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: add simplest test for ls #111

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 2, 2024
Merged

test: add simplest test for ls #111

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 2, 2024

Conversation

trym-b
Copy link
Contributor

@trym-b trym-b commented Mar 25, 2024

Motivation

Many top level commands are missing tests. This is a first step to add a test for ls with proper
test data.

Changes

This commit adds a very simple test for ls that
checks that it does not crash when reading a file.

Future work

Add more checks to the test so that it is even
better at avoiding regressions.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Ilya Kreymer for providing the test data through issue
#99

# Motivation

Many top level commands are missing tests. This is
a first step to add a test for `ls` with proper
test data.

# Changes

This commit adds a very simple test for `ls` that
checks that it does not crash when reading a file.

# Future work

Add more checks to the test so that it is even
better at avoiding regressions.

# Acknowledgements

Thanks to Ilya Kreymer for providing the test data
through issue
#99
@trym-b trym-b merged commit fdd8681 into main Apr 2, 2024
7 checks passed
@trym-b trym-b deleted the test/ls-test-data branch April 2, 2024 08:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants