Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

For a header-only library you have to clone 214MB #482

Closed
frobware opened this issue Mar 3, 2017 · 1 comment · Fixed by #2081
Closed

For a header-only library you have to clone 214MB #482

frobware opened this issue Mar 3, 2017 · 1 comment · Fixed by #2081
Assignees
Labels
release item: 🔨 further change solution: duplicate the issue is a duplicate; refer to the linked issue instead solution: proposed fix a fix for the issue has been proposed and waits for confirmation
Milestone

Comments

@frobware
Copy link

frobware commented Mar 3, 2017

It would be nice if the tests and benchmark data could be separated from the include file. I just added this as a git submodule and discovered the clone is 214MB.

@gregmarr
Copy link
Contributor

gregmarr commented Mar 3, 2017

#96

@nlohmann nlohmann added the solution: duplicate the issue is a duplicate; refer to the linked issue instead label Mar 3, 2017
@nlohmann nlohmann closed this as completed Mar 3, 2017
@nlohmann nlohmann reopened this May 4, 2020
@nlohmann nlohmann linked a pull request May 4, 2020 that will close this issue
@nlohmann nlohmann self-assigned this May 4, 2020
@nlohmann nlohmann added this to the Release 3.8.0 milestone May 4, 2020
@nlohmann nlohmann added release item: 🔨 further change solution: proposed fix a fix for the issue has been proposed and waits for confirmation labels May 4, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release item: 🔨 further change solution: duplicate the issue is a duplicate; refer to the linked issue instead solution: proposed fix a fix for the issue has been proposed and waits for confirmation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants