Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nc Feat: Allow inline edit rich text field in form view #7974

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Mar 26, 2024

Conversation

rameshmane7218
Copy link
Collaborator

@rameshmane7218 rameshmane7218 commented Mar 26, 2024

Change Summary

Provide summary of changes with issue number if any.

Change type

  • feat: (new feature for the user, not a new feature for build script)
  • fix: (bug fix for the user, not a fix to a build script)
  • docs: (changes to the documentation)
  • style: (formatting, missing semi colons, etc; no production code change)
  • refactor: (refactoring production code, eg. renaming a variable)
  • test: (adding missing tests, refactoring tests; no production code change)
  • chore: (updating grunt tasks etc; no production code change)

Test/ Verification

Provide summary of changes.

Additional information / screenshots (optional)

Anything for maintainers to be made aware of

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added handling for form fields and survey forms in the Rich Text component, including focus and blur event management.
    • Introduced a new LazyCellRichText component for enhanced text editing in forms.
    • Implemented mobile mode detection and handling in forms for improved user experience on mobile devices.
  • Enhancements

    • Improved link options in Rich Text with automatic width adjustment upon component mount.
    • Updated visibility conditions for tooltips to better accommodate form interfaces.
  • Style Updates

    • Refined styling and conditions for input fields and text areas across various components and pages for a more consistent and polished user interface.

@rameshmane7218 rameshmane7218 added the 🛑 Status: Do Not Merge Used in PR only. The PR cannot be merged due to some reasons. label Mar 26, 2024
@rameshmane7218 rameshmane7218 self-assigned this Mar 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 26, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The updates across various components and pages focus on enhancing form functionality and user interaction within the GUI. Key enhancements include the introduction of form field recognition, improved event handling for focus and blur, and adjustments to UI responsiveness and styling. Specifically, these changes aim to better support survey forms and rich text inputs, streamline user experience in mobile mode, and refine the visual presentation of form elements.

Changes

File(s) Summary
packages/.../RichText.vue Introduced isSurveyForm and isFormField to improve form field handling, added focus and blur event management, and updated UI logic and styling.
packages/.../RichText/LinkOptions.vue Implemented onMountLinkOptions to adjust UI width upon component mounting.
packages/.../TextArea.vue Enhanced conditional rendering for rich text mode and form scenarios, and adjusted tooltip visibility.
packages/.../Form.vue Added mobile mode detection and dynamic focus management based on form headings, removed specific styling rule.
packages/.../index/[typeOrId]/form/[viewId]/index.vue Modified styling logic for inputs and text areas to better accommodate different user interaction states.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@rameshmane7218 rameshmane7218 added trigger-CI force trigger CI even if PR in draft mode 🛑 Status: Do Not Merge Used in PR only. The PR cannot be merged due to some reasons. and removed 🛑 Status: Do Not Merge Used in PR only. The PR cannot be merged due to some reasons. labels Mar 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e1f00d9 and 93ea0ae.
Files selected for processing (5)
  • packages/nc-gui/components/cell/RichText.vue (11 hunks)
  • packages/nc-gui/components/cell/RichText/LinkOptions.vue (1 hunks)
  • packages/nc-gui/components/cell/TextArea.vue (2 hunks)
  • packages/nc-gui/components/smartsheet/Form.vue (6 hunks)
  • packages/nc-gui/pages/index/[typeOrId]/form/[viewId]/index.vue (2 hunks)
Additional comments: 14
packages/nc-gui/pages/index/[typeOrId]/form/[viewId]/index.vue (2)
  • 124-134: The CSS changes introduced for input fields and text areas aim to improve the styling and user interface. However, it's important to ensure that these changes do not inadvertently affect the accessibility or usability of these elements, especially in different themes (light/dark) or screen sizes.

Consider verifying:

  • The contrast ratios in both light and dark modes to ensure text is easily readable.
  • The responsiveness of the input fields and text areas across various screen sizes.
  • If any of these changes impact the usability for users relying on keyboard navigation or screen readers.
  • 198-200: The addition of .nc-cell-attachment class with h-auto styling is a good approach to ensure that attachment cells adapt their height based on content. This change enhances the visual consistency and user experience within the form.
packages/nc-gui/components/cell/RichText/LinkOptions.vue (1)
  • 162-166: The onMountLinkOptions function is a practical enhancement for setting the component's width upon mounting. This ensures a consistent and responsive user interface. However, it's hardcoded to 95% which might not be optimal in all scenarios or screen sizes.

Consider making the width dynamically calculated based on the parent element's width or available screen space to enhance responsiveness across different devices.

packages/nc-gui/components/cell/TextArea.vue (1)
  • 280-280: The updated visibility condition for NcTooltip to include !isForm ensures tooltips are appropriately displayed based on the form's context. This is a thoughtful refinement that improves the user interface by providing contextual help or information when needed.
packages/nc-gui/components/cell/RichText.vue (5)
  • 13-13: The addition of isSurveyForm to the imports is a good practice, ensuring that the component can adapt its behavior based on the form context. This enhances the flexibility and reusability of the component across different parts of the application.
  • 29-29: Setting a default value of false for isFormField in the props definition is a clear and explicit way to manage the component's behavior. This makes it easier for other developers to understand the default behavior of the component without having to dig through the code.
  • 195-199: The onFocusWrapper method introduced to handle focus events more robustly is a valuable addition, especially in form contexts. It ensures that the editor can gain focus under the right conditions, improving user interaction. However, it's crucial to test this functionality across different browsers and devices to ensure consistent behavior.
  • 207-207: The logic to toggle the editor's editability based on the readOnly prop is crucial for maintaining the correct state of the component. This ensures that the component behaves as expected in different scenarios, such as when a form is in view-only mode. It's a good practice to keep such logic reactive to prop changes.
  • 467-467: The explicit setting of line-height for h1 tags within the rich text editor ensures better control over text formatting and appearance. This is important for maintaining visual consistency and readability within the editor. Similar adjustments for other heading levels (h2, h3, etc.) are also commendable.
packages/nc-gui/components/smartsheet/Form.vue (5)
  • 83-83: The addition of isMobileMode in the useGlobal() function assignment introduces a new reactive property for handling mobile-specific logic. Ensure that this property is properly utilized throughout the component to enhance mobile user experience.
  • 1026-1033: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1029-1067]

The focus and blur event listeners added to the form heading (NcForm.heading) and form subheading (NcForm.subheading) are a good practice for managing active states and improving user interaction. However, ensure that these events do not conflict with other global or component-specific event listeners that might affect the form's behavior.

  • 1105-1112: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1081-1109]

Similar to the previous comment, the focus and blur event listeners added to the form subheading (NcForm.subheading) enhance user interaction by managing active states. It's important to test these changes thoroughly, especially in complex forms with multiple interactive elements, to ensure a smooth user experience.

  • 1026-1033: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [83-1109]

Given the significant changes related to focus and blur event handling for form headings and subheadings, it's crucial to verify that these changes integrate well with the existing form logic and do not introduce any unintended side effects, especially in mobile mode where UI behavior might differ.

  • 83-83: The removal of specific styling for .nc-form-right-panel .nc-form-rich-text-field .nc-text-area-rich-link-option-input indicates a change in the styling approach for these elements. Ensure that the removal of this styling does not negatively impact the visual consistency and user experience of the form, especially in contexts where these elements are heavily utilized.
Verification successful

The search for references to the removed styling in the codebase did not yield any results. This indicates that the removed styling is not referenced elsewhere, suggesting that its removal was likely intentional and carefully considered. Without further evidence of a negative impact on the visual consistency and user experience, it's reasonable to conclude that the removal of this specific styling does not adversely affect the form's appearance or functionality.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any references to the removed styling in other parts of the codebase
echo "Searching for references to removed styling..."
grep -r ".nc-form-right-panel .nc-form-rich-text-field .nc-text-area-rich-link-option-input" ./packages

Length of output: 208

packages/nc-gui/components/cell/TextArea.vue Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 26, 2024

Uffizzi Preview deployment-48973 was deleted.

@rameshmane7218 rameshmane7218 removed the 🛑 Status: Do Not Merge Used in PR only. The PR cannot be merged due to some reasons. label Mar 26, 2024
@dstala dstala merged commit 779db01 into develop Mar 26, 2024
25 of 55 checks passed
@dstala dstala deleted the nc-feat/inline-rich-text-field-edit-in-form-view branch March 26, 2024 17:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
trigger-CI force trigger CI even if PR in draft mode
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants