fix: Email invitation bug #8505
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe change in Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/nocodb/src/utils/emailUtils.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/nocodb/src/utils/emailUtils.ts
Signed-off-by: Pranav C <pranavxc@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (3)
scripts/upgradeNcGui.js (3)
Line range hint
1-3: Ensure consistent use ofrequirestatements.Consider destructuring
requirestatements for consistency and clarity, e.g.,const { execSync } = require('child_process');.
[!TIP]
Codebase VerificationThe current implementation of the
replacePackageNameandreplacePackageVersionfunctions inscripts/upgradeNcGui.jsandscripts/upgradeNocodbSdk.jsuses nested callbacks within Promises, which can lead to callback hell and reduced readability. Refactoring these functions to use async/await can improve readability and maintainability.Recommendation:
Refactor the
replacePackageNameandreplacePackageVersionfunctions to use async/await for better readability and error handling.Example Refactoring:
const fs = require('fs').promises; const replacePackageName = async (filePath) => { try { const data = await fs.readFile(filePath, 'utf8'); const result = data.replace(/nc-lib-gui/g, ncLibPackage.name); await fs.writeFile(filePath, result, 'utf8'); } catch (err) { throw err; } }; const replacePackageVersion = async (filePath) => { try { const data = await fs.readFile(filePath, 'utf8'); const rgx = new RegExp(`"${nocodbSdkPackage.name}": ".*"`, "g"); const result = data.replace(rgx, `"${nocodbSdkPackage.name}": "${nocodbSdkPackage.version}"`); await fs.writeFile(filePath, result, 'utf8'); } catch (err) { throw err; } };
- Refactor
replacePackageNameinscripts/upgradeNcGui.jsandscripts/upgradeNocodbSdk.js.- Refactor
replacePackageVersioninscripts/upgradeNocodbSdk.js.Analysis chain
Line range hint
9-19: Check error handling in asynchronous operations.The
replacePackageNamefunction uses callbacks which might lead to callback hell. Consider refactoring to use Promises or async/await for better readability and error handling.
Let's review the specific instances of
reject(err)in thescripts/upgradeNcGui.jsandscripts/upgradeNocodbSdk.jsfiles to understand the current error handling patterns and determine if refactoring to Promises or async/await is warranted.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify error handling in asynchronous operations. # Test: Search for error handling patterns in asynchronous functions. rg --type js 'reject\(err\)'Length of output: 617
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract lines around the instances of `reject(err)` to review the context of error handling. # Extract lines around `reject(err)` in scripts/upgradeNcGui.js rg --type js --context 5 'reject\(err\)' scripts/upgradeNcGui.js # Extract lines around `reject(err)` in scripts/upgradeNocodbSdk.js rg --type js --context 5 'reject\(err\)' scripts/upgradeNocodbSdk.jsLength of output: 2074
Line range hint
32-44: Optimize Promise handling and ensure error propagation.The handling of Promises in the conditional block could be optimized by using
async/awaitfor better readability and error handling. Consider refactoring to ensure errors are not swallowed.- Promise.all(filePaths.map(filePath => { return replacePackageName(filePath) })).then(() => { - bumbVersionAndSave(); - }) + async function updatePackages() { + try { + await Promise.all(filePaths.map(filePath => replacePackageName(filePath))); + bumbVersionAndSave(); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to update packages:', error); + } + } + updatePackages();
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- scripts/upgradeNcGui.js (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
scripts/upgradeNcGui.js (1)
Line range hint
21-30: Review the use of environment variables and version bump logic.The function
bumbVersionAndSaveuses environment variables and performs a version bump. Ensure that the environment variables are documented and the version bump logic is tested.
|
Uffizzi Preview |
Change Summary
Change type
Test/ Verification
Provide summary of changes.
Additional information / screenshots (optional)
Anything for maintainers to be made aware of