Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support HOCON for configuration. (PR welcome) #348

Closed
meyerzinn opened this issue Sep 17, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

Support HOCON for configuration. (PR welcome) #348

meyerzinn opened this issue Sep 17, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@meyerzinn
Copy link

It's be awesome if we could use HOCON for our configuration files.

Thanks!

@lorenwest
Copy link
Collaborator

Anyone interested in adding this support has a good pattern to use for testing and lazy loading.

@markstos
Copy link
Collaborator

HOCON sounds similiar to JSON5 which we already support.

@markstos markstos changed the title Support HOCON for configuration. Support HOCON for configuration. (PR welcome) Sep 19, 2016
@meyerzinn
Copy link
Author

HOCON is actually extremely dynamic, more than JSON5. It shifts the burden from the person to the machine; granted, that makes it more complex to parse. I do know libraries and such exist, like https://github.com/typesafehub/config https://github.com/typesafehub/config, but I’m not aware of a native JavaScript implementation. It’s a JSON superset so it can’t be too hard.

On Sep 19, 2016, at 8:28 AM, Mark Stosberg notifications@github.com wrote:

HOCON https://github.com/typesafehub/config/blob/master/HOCON.md sounds similiar to JSON5 https://www.npmjs.com/package/json5 which we already support.


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #348 (comment), or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF2RQkx315IQpMSD0VOihQNoULo3NVcfks5qro37gaJpZM4J_c7o.

@iMoses
Copy link

iMoses commented Jun 27, 2019

This is can be solved by addressing #181

@markstos
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing this in favor of #181.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants