New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changing to CommonJS -- simple cases #649
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #649 +/- ##
=====================================
Coverage 100% 100%
=====================================
Files 7 7
Lines 587 582 -5
Branches 183 181 -2
=====================================
- Hits 587 582 -5
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
This is a good direction I might consider, but can't merge at the moment due to various implications. Also changes will have to be made on v3 branch. Master branch is v2 only for now. |
Sounds mysterious. I've thought the project was looking for new contributions... did I misunderstand?
Any reasoning behind? The change is not breaking, not even a change in functionality. |
TL;DR: I can't merge it as the actual export isn't a part of the tests. I can't verify this to work in the wild. (which users can import using named export or just commonjs require). And if the goal is to remove I do agree 2.x was doing too much and hence making our work more difficult, so we aim to rectify this in v3. |
Here is my suggestion to move forward:
(I would love to only deal with commonjs export, but v2 is not the place to do it.) |
As suggested in #643
Single export cases are treated.