Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Compliance: OPC UA Method Attribute behaviour #1197

Closed
AndreasHeine opened this issue Sep 16, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Compliance: OPC UA Method Attribute behaviour #1197

AndreasHeine opened this issue Sep 16, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
bug Conformance describe a gap in implementation with specification

Comments

@AndreasHeine
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor

node: v16
node-opcua version: 2.75.0

Logged in with Call-Permissions:

image
image

Logged in without Call-Permissions:

image
image

if i call it i get "UserAccessDenied" which is correct! but the "UserExecutable" Attribute shall be "false" according to the Spec.

https://reference.opcfoundation.org/v104/Core/docs/Part3/5.7/
image
@erossignon
Copy link
Member

Thank you for reporting.

@erossignon erossignon added Conformance describe a gap in implementation with specification bug labels Sep 19, 2022
erossignon added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 2, 2022
@erossignon
UserExecutable flag should be false if user has no Call permission #1197
e46448c
erossignon added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 2, 2022
@erossignon
UserExecutable flag should be false if user has no Call permission #1197
ed27c58
erossignon added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 2, 2022
@erossignon
UserExecutable flag should be false if user has no Call permission #1197
b5735d8
@erossignon
Copy link
Member

fixed in node-opcua@2.79.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Conformance describe a gap in implementation with specification
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@erossignon @AndreasHeine