This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 18, 2018. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
doc: additional clarifications to stability policy #22
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Better, but the
semver-*
language is a little unnecessary, since it is the same what applies to everything else.It should be noted that ES6 features can be used internally. i.e. io.js already uses a good amount of
const
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know it's a bit redundant. The idea is to err on the side of clarity. There's been quite a bit of contention on this between the two projects and I'd rather it be absolutely clear what it being decided on. We can refine the text later once we're sure there is consensus.
I removed the note about the use of ES6 features internally because of the "if it can be done transparently" comment. The stability policy is concerned primarily with the API so if adding ES6 features can be done without impacting API, it's not clear we need to include it here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, cool then.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI this isn't really true "The Node.js Core Library API is currently built around ES5 Language features" given iterable buffers etc.